From August 15, 2026, with the implementation of the Ecological Environment Code, the filing system for environmental management of new chemical substances will be completely discontinued, and substances previously handled through the filing pathway will need to be transferred to the registration system. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has also clarified that overseas companies cannot act directly as applicants; relevant applications must be submitted by domestic importers or manufacturers. At the same time, the approval period for simplified registration will be extended to 1 to 2 months, and the forms in the government affairs system will also be updated. For companies importing new environmentally friendly materials and related intermediates and additives, this is not merely a procedural adjustment, but a signal that the pace of compliance preparation needs to be reorganized.

After Filing Is Phased Out, the Application Pathway Will Shift to Registration

According to the information that has been confirmed, from August 15, 2026, the filing system for environmental management of new chemical substances will be completely discontinued. Substances previously subject to filing will no longer follow the original filing method, but will instead be managed under the registration system. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has also clarified that overseas companies may not apply directly; domestic importers or manufacturers must act as the applicants.

In addition, the approval period for simplified registration will be adjusted to 1 to 2 months, and the relevant forms in the government affairs system will also be updated. In other words, projects that could previously proceed according to the filing schedule will subsequently need to prepare the applicant entity, materials, and timeline again under the registration system.

Which Business Areas Will Feel the Changes First

Lead Times in Import Trade Need to Be Recalculated

The import trade of products containing new environmentally friendly materials will be directly affected, especially for categories requiring compliance confirmation before the goods enter the market. Since the applicant must be a domestic importer or manufacturer, the way overseas suppliers previously participated in declarations will change. Contract signing, document return, and the allocation of responsibilities may all need to be reviewed in advance.

Raw Material Procurement and Formula Introduction Will Depend More on Document Completeness

For purchasers, the main impact will be reflected in the pace of introducing new materials. When importing new environmentally friendly materials such as additives for photovoltaic cleaning agents and components for weather-resistant coatings, whether the preliminary documentation is complete and whether the application approach is consistent will directly affect whether market access can be completed as planned. If procurement plans continue to follow the old filing schedule, timing mismatches may easily occur.

Processing, Manufacturing, and End-Use Applications Will Place Greater Emphasis on Delivery Coordination

Processing and manufacturing companies and end-use companies are generally more concerned with coordinating material arrival and production launch. After the compliance pathway is switched and the approval period is extended, the intervals between sample verification, small-batch introduction, and formal procurement may be involuntarily lengthened. For application scenarios that rely on imported functional additives and coating components, delivery plans and production schedules need to include wider buffers.

Supply Chain Service Providers Need to Update Documentation and Communication Standards

Customs declaration, supply chain coordination, compliance consulting, and other service areas will also be affected. Changes to the applicant entity, form updates, and the extension of the approval period will move more work forward to document preparation and coordination among the parties. Service providers need to confirm whether the client's current pathway is filing-based or registration-based, so as to avoid delaying progress by continuing to use outdated templates.

Which Details Should Companies Focus on Now

First Confirm Whether the Substance Falls Within the Scope of the Transfer from Filing to Registration

In practice, the first task for a company is to determine whether an existing or planned imported substance is among those previously subject to filing and whether it needs to switch to the registration system. This determination directly decides whether the company should prepare existing materials based on the filing approach or new application materials under the registration system.

Assign the Applicant Role to a Domestic Company in Advance

Since overseas companies cannot apply directly, domestic importers or manufacturers need to confirm as early as possible whether they will act as the applicant and who will be responsible for organizing and submitting materials and handling subsequent communications. For companies with existing overseas supply chain partnerships, contracts, authorizations, and document transmission methods will all need to be adjusted accordingly.

Work Backward from the 1-to-2-Month Approval Period for Procurement and Delivery

After the approval period for simplified registration is extended, companies should no longer schedule material introduction based on a short cycle. A more prudent approach is to incorporate approval, correction requests, system updates, and internal confirmation into the schedule as a whole, avoiding any impact on order delivery or project launch caused by overly tight time estimates.

Continue Monitoring System Form Updates and Subsequent Requirements

The upcoming update to the government affairs system forms indicates that the subsequent application format and submission requirements may change. What deserves greater attention at present is not whether a single project can proceed, but whether the application materials, field definitions, and process milestones will be further clarified after the new system goes live. This will directly affect the actual operating costs of companies.

This Is More Like a Pathway Shift Than a Short-Term Disruption

Viewed overall, the core message of this information is not a single approval change, but an institutional shift in the compliance management pathway for new chemical substances: filing is being phased out, the registration system is taking its place, the applicant role is being moved forward to domestic companies, and the approval period is being extended. Taken together, these changes indicate that companies cannot focus only on the outcome going forward; they also need to move preliminary preparation to an earlier stage.

From an industry perspective, this is more appropriately understood as a regulatory adjustment that requires continuous observation, rather than a static result that has already been fully finalized. What will ultimately affect business schedules is still the submission details after the system update, the registration material requirements, and the implementation approach applied to different categories in actual applications.

How Should It Be Understood at Present

Overall, the industry significance of this information is that compliance access for imported new environmentally friendly materials is shifting from the original filing logic to a clearer registration management logic. For companies, the key issue is not deciding whether the policy is important, but promptly confirming whether the substances involved, the applicant entity, and the timeline already match the new rules. At present, it is more appropriate to understand this as a regulatory development with a clearly defined direction, while the details of its implementation still require further verification.

Scope of Public Information on Which This Article Is Based

This article was generated based on the information title, event date, and event summary provided by the user, without introducing any specific facts, company names, project names, or data beyond the input. Information sources typically related to this type of information include official announcements, company announcements, industry association information, reports from authoritative media, and documents issued by standards organizations. However, no specific link to an official source was provided in this input, so the original policy text and supporting implementation requirements still need to be continuously verified.